Nutopia Forum Index
Bay Area Forum for Asians
Log in to check your private messages
Advanced Search traditional simplified
star FAQ Search Memberlist Usergroups Register Log in star
青鳥   聖域回音 (全)   回音(全)   洛克人小說   寵物貼圖   Bay Area Happenings   素菜食譜   Free Medical Info   Random things   每日一女   牆紙桌布下載   流行音樂  
家常食譜   簡易微波爐食譜   小電影   免費軟硬電腦教學   IBM Content Manager  
Username:    Password:    Log me on automatically each visit   
                                                      
Nutopia Forum Index
Nutopia Forum Index Bay Area Happenings Did eBay really win its case against Craigslist?
View previous topic :: View next topic
Post new topic     Reply to topic Page 1 of 1
Did eBay really win its case against Craigslist? Sat Sep 11, 2010 1:41 am
Author Message
SFGateKeeper
萬人迷
萬人迷

Joined: 10 May 2010
Posts: 5573
Reply with quote

Post subject: Did eBay really win its case against Craigslist?

Bookmark and Share
URL
Embed
Link
BBCode


Did eBay really win its case against Craigslist?


EBay Inc. promptly declared victory on Thursday, after the Delaware Court of Chancery issued a ruling in its long-running lawsuit against Craigslist. But not everyone reads the outcome that way.

"More fortunate than Goliath, eBay leaves this field with only a gash across its forehead; less fortunate than David, Craigslist leaves this field with something less than total victory," the opinion said.

Here's the background:

EBay, the San Jose e-commerce giant, acquired a 28 percent stake in Craigslist from disgruntled shareholder Phillip Knowlton in August 2004. Almost immediately after, eBay executives began pressuring majority shareholders Craig Newmark and Jim Buckmaster to sell their shares, pushed them to squeeze more money from the site and began acquiring competing classified listings sites overseas, according to Craigslist.

After eBay unveiled a direct U.S. rival, Craigslist adopted a poison pill provision to prevent a hostile takeover, reorganized shares in a manner that effectively reduced eBay's stake to 24 percent and staggered board elections in a manner that made it difficult for eBay to appoint a director.

The court's decision on Thursday did invalidate Craiglist's poison pill and upheld various minority investor rights, which is what allowed eBay to claim victory. But Judge Chandler allowed Craigslist to keep in place its staggered board of director elections.

That's key because it effectively means eBay can't elect a board member, unless Buckmaster or Newmark cast their own votes for such a candidate. Neither, however, could exactly be described as a fan of eBay these days.

When a full slate of board members are elected annually, an investor's voting shares multiplies by the number of open board slots. In this case, that would allow a minority stakeholder like eBay to throw all of its shares behind its own candidate and successfully elect him or her, explained James Cox, professor of corporate and securities law at Duke Law school, in an interview with The Chronicle.

But with these staggered elections, only one director is up for election per year, effectively giving the majority stakeholders total power over director appointments. That means eBay won't be privy to confidential information about Craigslist, or have any real say over strategic decisions, Cox said.

"The fight ... is over, unless eBay can find a way to influence one of those other shareholders to change alliances, but I don't think that's going to happen," he said. "They're a minority stakeholder with no say in how things happen."

He says the likely next move is a negotiated buyout of eBay's shares, but since it lost on a key point of the case, it's likely to get less for them than it might have two days ago.

EBay presented a very different take on the matter, focused on the decision regarding the poison pill.

"We are very pleased that the Court gave eBay what it sought from the lawsuit," said Michael Jacobson, eBay general counsel. "eBay brought this suit to protect its own shareholders and preserve its valuable investment in Craigslist. The evidence presented at trial demonstrated that the actions were taken by Mr. Buckmaster and Mr. Newmark to benefit themselves at the expense of eBay, and we are gratified that the Court recognized these actions were both unfair and unlawful and rectified the situation."

Craigslist did not respond to an inquiry from The Chronicle.

The decision, unless it's appealed, will allow Craigslist's countersuit to move forward in a San Francisco court. The San Francisco classifieds site alleges eBay misused confidential information about Craigslist to launch a competing service in the U.S.

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/blogs/techchron/detail?entry_id=72031
View user's profile Send private message
Back to top
Did eBay really win its case against Craigslist? Sat Sep 11, 2010 1:41 am
Author Message
Special Offers!
萬人迷
萬人迷

Joined: 10 May 2010
Posts: 5573
Reply with quote

Post subject:


Medical Info Blog








Did eBay really win its case against Craigslist?





Did eBay really win its case against Craigslist?

亚洲无码转帖区 春暖花开 大美女 视频 姝ユ辰???? ribennuyu 王君平 
陈小珍色欲诱惑 qvod 水菜丽无码 叶玉卿#pn0 neishe meinv ?????借?茶??? 
郭羡妮 奶 大 umi 09届毕业生张丽涵 qvod 穴走光 
cqwww.net_性爱百招 李伊娜 qvod 璋??琚?疆濂 護士小姐打針 春暖花开性吧有你亚洲 
陳匡怡桌布 www.kk44kk.con qvodzy.org rio yuzuki  王思佳寫真 
及川奈央 性吧春暖花开公告区 若菜濑奈 合集 郭碧婷#pn0  
omeimeinvzuoai 浜轰??烘????句附 ?炬?ч??sex浜?娲叉???? ??杈卞コ??棰?棰??剧?? 由爱可奈 无码qvod 
cqwww.net_色欲教室 cqwww.net_性爱 黑絲 爆乳 性吧有你春暖花开炎狼 
瀵归?蹇???灞辫???? 春暖花开 炎狼 6月 AV 人体艺术 www.AVRTYS.com 性吧春暖花开亚洲无码 
春暖花开8亚洲无码 jumav 波多野 日本美女全裸寫真集 人像 性感美女相片 
View user's profile Send private message
Back to top
Post new topic     Reply to topic Page 1 of 1
Display posts from previous:
Back to top
Related Links:

Did eBay really win its case against Craigslist? Did eBay really win its case against Craigslist? Did eBay really win its case against Craigslist? Did eBay really win its case against Craigslist? Did eBay really win its case against Craigslist? Did eBay really win its case against Craigslist? Did eBay really win its case against Craigslist?

All times are GMT + 8 Hours